Written by buy-old-gmail-accounts » Updated on: June 04th, 2025
harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach
This article is more than 7 years old
đ24 Hours Reply/Contactđ
Telegram:- @sellsusa
WhatsApp:- +1 (606) 264-0854
Email: [email protected]
Facebook: Pege Sellsusa1
YouTube: Sellsusa01
https://sellsusa.com/product/buy-facebook-accounts/
Whistleblower describes how firm linked to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon compiled user data to target American voters
âI made Steve Bannonâs psychological warfare toolâ: meet the data war whistleblower
Mark Zuckerberg breaks silence on Cambridge Analytica
Carole Cadwalladr and Emma Graham-Harrison
Sat 17 Mar 2018 22.03 GMT
Share
484
The data analytics firm that worked with Donald Trumpâs election team and the winning Brexit campaign harvested millions of Facebook profiles of US voters, in one of the tech giantâs biggest ever data breaches, and used them to build a powerful software program to predict and influence choices at the ballot box.
A whistleblower has revealed to the Observer how Cambridge Analytica â a company owned by the hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, and headed at the time by Trumpâs key adviser Steve Bannon â used personal information taken without authorisation in early 2014 to build a system that could profile individual US voters, in order to target them with personalised political advertisements.
Christopher Wylie, who worked with a Cambridge University academic to obtain the data, told the Observer: âWe exploited Facebook to harvest millions of peopleâs profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons. That was the basis the entire company was built on.â
Documents seen by the Observer, and confirmed by a Facebook statement, show that by late 2015 the company had found out that information had been harvested on an unprecedented scale. However, at the time it failed to alert users and took only limited steps to recover and secure the private information of more than 50 million individuals.
Profile
Cambridge Analytica: the key players
Show
The New York Times is reporting that copies of the data harvested for Cambridge Analytica could still be found online; its reporting team had viewed some of the raw data.
The data was collected through an app called thisisyourdigitallife, built by academic Aleksandr Kogan, separately from his work at Cambridge University. Through his company Global Science Research (GSR), in collaboration with Cambridge Analytica, hundreds of thousands of users were paid to take a personality test and agreed to have their data collected for academic use.
However, the app also collected the information of the test-takersâ Facebook friends, leading to the accumulation of a data pool tens of millions-strong. Facebookâs âplatform policyâ allowed only collection of friendsâ data to improve user experience in the app and barred it being sold on or used for advertising. The discovery of the unprecedented data harvesting, and the use to which it was put, raises urgent new questions about Facebookâs role in targeting voters in the US presidential election. It comes only weeks after indictments of 13 Russians by the special counsel Robert Mueller which stated they had used the platform to perpetrate âinformation warfareâ against the US.
Cambridge Analytica and Facebook are one focus of an inquiry into data and politics by the British Information Commissionerâs Office. Separately, the Electoral Commission is also investigating what role Cambridge Analytica played in the EU referendum.
âWe are investigating the circumstances in which Facebook data may have been illegally acquired and used,â said the information commissioner Elizabeth Denham. âItâs part of our ongoing investigation into the use of data analytics for political purposes which was launched to consider how political parties and campaigns, data analytics companies and social media platforms in the UK are using and analysing peopleâs personal information to micro-target voters.â
On Friday, four days after the Observer sought comment for this story, but more than two years after the data breach was first reported, Facebook announced that it was suspending Cambridge Analytica and Kogan from the platform, pending further information over misuse of data. Separately, Facebookâs external lawyers warned the Observer it was making âfalse and defamatoryâ allegations, and reserved Facebookâs legal position.
Steve Bannon
View image in fullscreen
Key Trump adviser Steve Bannon Photograph: Alain Robert/Sipa/Rex/Shutterstock
The revelations provoked widespread outrage. The Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced that the state would be launching an investigation. âResidents deserve answers immediately from Facebook and Cambridge Analytica,â she said on Twitter.
The Democratic senator Mark Warner said the harvesting of data on such a vast scale for political targeting underlined the need for Congress to improve controls. He has proposed an Honest Ads Act to regulate online political advertising the same way as television, radio and print. âThis story is more evidence that the online political advertising market is essentially the Wild West. Whether itâs allowing Russians to purchase political ads, or extensive micro-targeting based on ill-gotten user data, itâs clear that, left unregulated, this market will continue to be prone to deception and lacking in transparency,â he said.
Last month both Facebook and the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, told a parliamentary inquiry on fake news: that the company did not have or use private Facebook data.
Simon Milner, Facebookâs UK policy director, when asked if Cambridge Analytica had Facebook data, told MPs: âThey may have lots of data but it will not be Facebook user data. It may be data about people who are on Facebook that they have gathered themselves, but it is not data that we have provided.â
Cambridge Analyticaâs chief executive, Alexander Nix, told the inquiry: âWe do not work with Facebook data and we do not have Facebook data.â
Wylie, a Canadian data analytics expert who worked with Cambridge Analytica and Kogan to devise and implement the scheme, showed a dossier of evidence about the data misuse to the Observer which appears to raise questions about their testimony. He has passed it to the National Crime Agencyâs cybercrime unit and the Information Commissionerâs Office. It includes emails, invoices, contracts and bank transfers that reveal more than 50 million profiles â mostly belonging to registered US voters â were harvested from the site in one of the largest-ever breaches of Facebook data. Facebook on Friday said that it was also suspending Wylie from accessing the platform while it carried out its investigation, despite his role as a whistleblower.
At the time of the data breach, Wylie was a Cambridge Analytica employee, but Facebook described him as working for Eunoia Technologies, a firm he set up on his own after leaving his former employer in late 2014.
The evidence Wylie supplied to UK and US authorities includes a letter from Facebookâs own lawyers sent to him in August 2016, asking him to destroy any data he held that had been collected by GSR, the company set up by Kogan to harvest the profiles.
That legal letter was sent several months after the Guardian first reported the breach and days before it was officially announced that Bannon was taking over as campaign manager for Trump and bringing Cambridge Analytica with him.
âBecause this data was obtained and used without permission, and because GSR was not authorised to share or sell it to you, it cannot be used legitimately in the future and must be deleted immediately,â the letter said.
Facebook did not pursue a response when the letter initially went unanswered for weeks because Wylie was travelling, nor did it follow up with forensic checks on his computers or storage, he said.
âThat to me was the most astonishing thing. They waited two years and did absolutely nothing to check that the data was deleted. All they asked me to do was tick a box on a form and post it back.â
Paul-Olivier Dehaye, a data protection specialist, who spearheaded the investigative efforts into the tech giant, said: âFacebook has denied and denied and denied this. It has misled MPs and congressional investigators and itâs failed in its duties to respect the law.
âIt has a legal obligation to inform regulators and individuals about this data breach, and it hasnât. Itâs failed time and time again to be open and transparent.â
We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of profiles. And built models to exploit that and target their inner demons
Christopher Wylie
A majority of American states have laws requiring notification in some cases of data breach, including California, where Facebook is based.
Facebook denies that the harvesting of tens of millions of profiles by GSR and Cambridge Analytica was a data breach. It said in a statement that Kogan âgained access to this information in a legitimate way and through the proper channelsâ but âdid not subsequently abide by our rulesâ because he passed the information on to third parties.
Facebook said it removed the app in 2015 and required certification from everyone with copies that the data had been destroyed, although the letter to Wylie did not arrive until the second half of 2016. âWe are committed to vigorously enforcing our policies to protect peopleâs information. We will take whatever steps are required to see that this happens,â Paul Grewal, Facebookâs vice-president, said in a statement. The company is now investigating reports that not all data had been deleted.
Kogan, who has previously unreported links to a Russian university and took Russian grants for research, had a licence from Facebook to collect profile data, but it was for research purposes only. So when he hoovered up information for the commercial venture, he was violating the companyâs terms. Kogan maintains everything he did was legal, and says he had a âclose working relationshipâ with Facebook, which had granted him permission for his apps.
Quick Guide
How the Cambridge Analytica story unfolded
Show
The Observer has seen a contract dated 4 June 2014, which confirms SCL, an affiliate of Cambridge Analytica, entered into a commercial arrangement with GSR, entirely premised on harvesting and processing Facebook data. Cambridge Analytica spent nearly $1m on data collection, which yielded more than 50 million individual profiles that could be matched to electoral rolls. It then used the test results and Facebook data to build an algorithm that could analyse individual Facebook profiles and determine personality traits linked to voting behaviour.
The algorithm and database together made a powerful political tool. It allowed a campaign to identify possible swing voters and craft messages more likely to resonate.
đ24 Hours Reply/Contactđ
Telegram:- @sellsusa
WhatsApp:- +1 (606) 264-0854
Email: [email protected]
Facebook: Pege Sellsusa1
YouTube: Sellsusa01
https://sellsusa.com/product/buy-facebook-accounts/
âThe ultimate product of the training set is creating a âgold standardâ of understanding personality from Facebook profile information,â the contract specifies. It promises to create a database of 2 million âmatchedâ profiles, identifiable and tied to electoral registers, across 11 states, but with room to expand much further.
At the time, more than 50 million profiles represented around a third of active North American Facebook users, and nearly a quarter of potential US voters. Yet when asked by MPs if any of his firmâs data had come from GSR, Nix said: âWe had a relationship with GSR. They did some research for us back in 2014. That research proved to be fruitless and so the answer is no.â
Cambridge Analytica said that its contract with GSR stipulated that Kogan should seek informed consent for data collection and it had no reason to believe he would not.
GSR was âled by a seemingly reputable academic at an internationally renowned institution who made explicit contractual commitments to us regarding its legal authority to license data to SCL Electionsâ, a company spokesman said.
SCL Elections, an affiliate, worked with Facebook over the period to ensure it was satisfied no terms had been âknowingly breachedâ and provided a signed statement that all data and derivatives had been deleted, he said. Cambridge Analytica also said none of the data was used in the 2016 presidential election.
Steve Bannonâs lawyer said he had no comment because his client âknows nothing about the claims being assertedâ. He added: âThe first Mr Bannon heard of these reports was from media inquiries in the past few days.â He directed inquires to Nix.
The Observer
The Observer is the world's oldest Sunday newspaper, founded in 1791. It is published by Guardian News & Media and is editorially independent.
This is the archive of The Observer up until 21/04/2025. The Observer is now owned and operated by Tortoise Media.
We know, we know, we know ...
Seeing these messages is annoying. We know that. (Imagine what itâs like writing them ⊠)
But itâs also extremely important. One of the Guardianâs greatest assets is its reader-funded model.
1. Reader funding means we can cover what we like. Weâre not beholden to the political whims of a billionaire owner. No-one can tell us what not to say or what not to report.
2. Reader funding means we donât have to chase clicks and traffic. Weâre not desperately seeking your attention for its own sake: we pursue the stories that our editorial team deems important, and believe are worthy of your time.
3. Reader funding means we can keep our website open, allowing as many people as possible to read quality journalism from around the world â especially people who live in places where the free press is in peril.
Right now, the Guardianâs work is funded by just 2.4% of our regular readers. We know that not everyone can afford to pay for news, but if it would help twist your arm into supporting us, weâd love to offer readers like you in Bangladesh 30% off an annual All-access digital subscription.
đ24 Hours Reply/Contactđ
Telegram:- @sellsusa
WhatsApp:- +1 (606) 264-0854
Email: [email protected]
Facebook: Pege Sellsusa1
YouTube: Sellsusa01
https://sellsusa.com/product/buy-facebook-accounts/
Disclaimer: We do not promote, endorse, or advertise betting, gambling, casinos, or any related activities. Any engagement in such activities is at your own risk, and we hold no responsibility for any financial or personal losses incurred. Our platform is a publisher only and does not claim ownership of any content, links, or images unless explicitly stated. We do not create, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, legality, or originality of third-party content. Content may be contributed by guest authors or sponsored, and we assume no liability for its authenticity or any consequences arising from its use. If you believe any content or images infringe on your copyright, please contact us at [email protected] for immediate removal.
Copyright © 2019-2025 IndiBlogHub.com. All rights reserved. Hosted on DigitalOcean for fast, reliable performance.