💻

Codeium

Production-ready code assistants for developers and engineering teams

Free | Freemium | Paid | Enterprise ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 4.4/5 💻 Code Assistants 🕒 Updated
Visit Codeium ↗ Official website
Quick Verdict

Codeium is an AI code assistant that provides inline completions, multi-file code generation, and IDE plugins for developers and teams. It best fits individual developers and small teams who want a low-cost or free alternative to paid copilots while retaining private completions and IDE integrations. Pricing is tiered—with a free tier for basic use and paid Pro/Team plans for private code and collaboration (prices noted approximate).

Codeium is an AI code assistant that provides context-aware code completions, whole-function generation, and multi-IDE integrations. It focuses on lowering routine coding friction by offering completions in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, and the browser. The primary capability is large-scale code completion across 50+ languages with file-aware suggestions and multi-line generation. Codeium differentiates itself with a generous free tier for public/commercial use and optional paid tiers for private completions and team features. It serves individual developers, open-source contributors, and small engineering teams, and pricing remains accessible with a free option and affordable Pro/Team plans.

About Codeium

Codeium is an AI-powered code assistant positioned as a practical alternative to paid copilots. Founded as a startup focused on developer tooling, it markets itself around broad IDE coverage and pragmatic licensing for individuals and teams. The core value proposition is to deliver inline, file-aware completions and whole-function generation while supporting public and private code workflows. Codeium aims to lower friction for day-to-day development by embedding suggestions directly into the editor and offering browser-based snippet generation for code review and documentation tasks.

Feature-wise, Codeium offers several tangible capabilities. The VS Code extension provides inline autocompletions, “Complete Line” and “Complete Block” actions, and a Command Palette entry for on-demand generation. JetBrains users get equivalent completions via a dedicated plugin that preserves context across open files. The browser extension captures snippets from web pages and generates code examples or unit tests directly from selected text. Codeium supports 50+ programming languages and common frameworks and provides multi-line function generation that can reference other files in the workspace, reducing boilerplate. It also supports a CLI for quick code generation scripts and a Team dashboard for shared settings and usage visibility.

Pricing is split between a free tier, a Pro plan, and enterprise/Team offerings. The free tier permits individual use with unlimited public completions and basic IDE integrations; it’s intended for hobbyists and open-source contributors. Pro unlocks private completions, priority model capacity, and advanced settings—prices for Pro are listed approximately at $9–$12/month (monthly vs annual billing affects cost). Team and Enterprise plans are custom-priced and add centralized billing, single sign-on, audit logs, and higher usage quotas. Note: pricing and exact limits can change; verify current figures on Codeium’s pricing page for up-to-date details.

Typical users include individual developers using Codeium to reduce routine coding time and teams standardizing completions across repos. For example, a frontend engineer uses Codeium to generate complete React component skeletons and reduce boilerplate by 30–50% per feature, while a backend engineer uses it to scaffold service endpoints and unit tests for faster onboarding. Small engineering teams use Team plans for consistent completions across repositories. Compared to competitors like GitHub Copilot, Codeium emphasizes a generous free tier and broad IDE/browser coverage as its competitive differentiators.

What makes Codeium different

Three capabilities that set Codeium apart from its nearest competitors.

  • Generous free tier that allows unlimited public completions without a paid subscription.
  • Browser extension that converts selected web text into runnable code examples or tests.
  • Team dashboard with centralized settings, SSO support, and audit logs for enterprise governance.

Is Codeium right for you?

✅ Best for
  • Individual developers who need low-cost private code completions
  • Open-source contributors who want unlimited public completions
  • Small teams who need shared policies and centralized billing
  • Frontend/backend engineers who want quick multi-line scaffolding
❌ Skip it if
  • Skip if you require enterprise SLA-backed uptime and dedicated model instances.
  • Skip if you need deep integration with an internal code-hosting platform unsupported by Codeium.

✅ Pros

  • Wide IDE coverage: official VS Code and JetBrains plugins plus a browser extension
  • Generous free tier that supports unlimited public completions for individuals
  • Team features like centralized settings, SSO, and usage dashboards for collaboration

❌ Cons

  • Pro pricing and exact quotas vary and can be unclear; enterprise features are custom-priced
  • Occasional hallucinations and context-misaligned suggestions on large, complex codebases

Codeium Pricing Plans

Current tiers and what you get at each price point. Verified against the vendor's pricing page.

Plan Price What you get Best for
Free Free Unlimited public completions, basic IDE plugins, no private completions Open-source contributors and hobbyist devs
Pro Approx $9–$12/month Private completions, priority model access, personal settings, annual billing cheaper Individual professionals needing private code completion
Team Custom Central billing, SSO, audit logs, higher usage quotas, shared settings Small engineering teams needing admin controls

Best Use Cases

  • Frontend developer using it to generate React component boilerplate 40% faster
  • Backend engineer using it to scaffold REST endpoints and unit tests in minutes
  • QA engineer using it to auto-generate example test cases and fixtures from specs

Integrations

Visual Studio Code JetBrains IDEs Chrome/Edge browser extension

How to Use Codeium

  1. 1
    Install the VS Code extension
    Open Visual Studio Code, go to Extensions (Ctrl+Shift+X), search for 'Codeium', click Install. Successful install shows the Codeium icon in the Activity Bar and enables inline completions in open files.
  2. 2
    Sign in using an identity provider
    Click the Codeium icon and choose Sign in (GitHub or email). Authorize access when prompted; a successful sign-in displays your account name and unlocks private completions if your plan allows them.
  3. 3
    Trigger a completion in an editor
    Place the cursor in a function or starter line, press Tab or use the Command Palette entry 'Codeium: Complete' to get inline suggestions. A visible completion snippet that inserts with Tab means success.
  4. 4
    Use the browser extension for snippets
    Install the Codeium browser extension, select code or text on a webpage, right-click and choose 'Generate with Codeium' to produce runnable examples or tests; results open in a popup you can copy into the editor.

Ready-to-Use Prompts for Codeium

Copy these into Codeium as-is. Each targets a different high-value workflow.

Generate React TypeScript Component
Create accessible React component file with styled-components
You are an experienced frontend engineer. Generate a single-file React functional component in TypeScript using styled-components. Constraints: export default component, include a typed Props interface, accept children, provide default parameter values for optional props, include JSDoc for each prop, and avoid external CSS files. Output format: present the full file contents with a filename comment at the top (e.g., // Button.tsx) and include any required imports. Example: implement a Button with props {label: string, onClick?: () => void, disabled?: boolean} and include accessibility attributes and keyboard support.
Expected output: One complete .tsx file as a code block with imports, a typed Props interface, styled-components, and the default export component.
Pro tip: Include explicit aria attributes and role only for interactive elements that need them to avoid over-annotating accessible controls.
Create Jest Unit Test Skeleton
Produce Jest tests for pure JavaScript/TypeScript functions
You are a test engineer. Produce a Jest unit test file skeleton for a small pure function. Constraints: include correct import/require, create four test cases (normal, edge, error, validation), use table-driven tests where applicable, and mock external dependencies if present. Output format: provide a complete test file with a filename comment (e.g., // add.test.ts) using describe/it or test blocks and beforeEach/afterEach placeholders. Example: for function add(a: number, b: number): number include positive numbers, negative numbers, zero, and invalid input behavior.
Expected output: One complete test file as a code block with describe and four test cases, including imports and mocks where needed.
Pro tip: Use table.each for permutations of inputs to keep tests concise and easier to extend later.
Scaffold Express TypeScript Endpoint
Generate Express route, controller, and Joi schema
You are a backend TypeScript developer. Scaffold a REST endpoint for an Express.js app with a router, controller, and request validation. Constraints: use TypeScript, express.Router, Joi for validation, async controller returning standardized JSON {success, data, error}, apply proper HTTP status codes, and include try/catch error handling with centralized error forwarding (next). Output format: produce three files with filename comments (router.ts, controller.ts, schema.ts) and a short app.ts registration snippet showing how to mount the router. Example target: implement POST /api/users accepting {name:string, email:string}.
Expected output: Three TypeScript files (router.ts, controller.ts, schema.ts) and a short app registration snippet, each shown as code blocks with filename comments.
Pro tip: Return a consistent error shape and include an internal error code field to simplify client-side error handling and monitoring.
Convert Sync Function To Async
Transform synchronous Python HTTP function to async
You are a Python engineer. Convert the following synchronous function to an async implementation that uses aiohttp for HTTP calls while preserving the public API. Constraints: keep the original function name, add type hints, make the code cancellation-friendly, and implement retries with exponential backoff (max 3 attempts). Output format: show the original function as a commented block, then provide the async implementation and a pytest-asyncio test skeleton with at least two tests (success and retry behavior). Example original: def fetch_data(url: str) -> dict: resp = requests.get(url); return resp.json().
Expected output: A commented original function, an async implementation using aiohttp with type hints and retry logic, plus a pytest-asyncio test file skeleton.
Pro tip: Use asyncio.TimeoutError and aiohttp.ClientTimeout for predictable cancellation and wrap retries in an asyncio shield only when necessary to avoid masking cancellations.
Build Terraform S3 CloudFront Module
Reusable Terraform module for S3 + CloudFront
You are a Terraform author and AWS specialist. Create a reusable Terraform module that provisions a secure S3 bucket served via CloudFront with best-practice defaults. Constraints: target Terraform 1.4+ HCL, provide input variables for bucket_name, enable_logging (bool), allowed_origins (list), price_class, and optional acm_certificate_arn, enforce least-privilege IAM, block public access by default, enable versioning and a lifecycle rule for temporary objects. Output format: produce main.tf, variables.tf, outputs.tf, iam.tf, a README.md usage example, and an example terraform.tfvars; include a short security rationale and a minimal test using terraform validate. Include short in-line comments in HCL.
Expected output: Multiple HCL files (main.tf, variables.tf, outputs.tf, iam.tf), a README.md usage example, terraform.tfvars sample, and a short security rationale paragraph.
Pro tip: Provide module-level defaults that favor security (e.g., block_public_acls = true) but expose opt-in variables for public hosting to avoid accidental data exposure.
Perform Security-Focused Code Review
Automated PR review with patch and comments
You are a senior software engineer and security-focused reviewer. Given a code diff or PR description (paste below), produce: 1) a concise 3-line summary of major issues (performance, correctness, security, style), 2) at least six actionable inline review comments referencing file and line ranges, and 3) a unified diff patch that fixes the top three issues. Constraints: keep fixes minimal and well-tested, prefer non-breaking changes, and explain trade-offs for each fix. Output format: start with the 3-line summary, then numbered inline comments, then a standard unified diff block. Example comment: "server.js:45 — Avoid synchronous fs.readFileSync in request handler; use async API."
Expected output: A 3-line summary, a numbered list of ≥6 inline review comments with file/line references, and a unified diff patch fixing the top three issues.
Pro tip: When suggesting fixes include small, runnable tests or CI commands that verify the change to lower time-to-merge for maintainers.

Codeium vs Alternatives

Bottom line

Choose Codeium over GitHub Copilot if you prefer a generous free tier and broader browser/IDE plugin coverage for public code.

Head-to-head comparisons between Codeium and top alternatives:

Compare
Codeium vs Orb Producer Suite (Hexachords)
Read comparison →

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Codeium cost?+
Codeium has a free tier; Pro is roughly $9/mo. The free tier covers unlimited public completions and basic IDE plugins. Pro (approx $9–$12/month) adds private completions, priority capacity, and advanced settings, while Team/Enterprise plans are custom-priced and include SSO, audit logs, and higher quotas. Check Codeium’s pricing page for current rates and billing options.
Is there a free version of Codeium?+
Yes — Codeium offers a free tier for public completions. This free plan lets individuals use IDE plugins and receive completions against public or non-private codebases without paying. Private completions, priority access, and team administration are gated behind Pro or Team plans. The free tier is intended for hobbyists and open-source contributors.
How does Codeium compare to GitHub Copilot?+
Codeium emphasizes a generous free tier and broader browser plugin support. Both provide inline completions and multi-line generation, but Codeium focuses on broad IDE/browser coverage and team dashboard controls; GitHub Copilot integrates tightly with GitHub and Microsoft ecosystems. Choose by whether you prioritize pricing and multi-IDE plugins (Codeium) or GitHub-native workflows (Copilot).
What is Codeium best used for?+
Codeium is best for inline completions, scaffolding, and multi-file generation. It speeds routine coding: generating component skeletons, endpoint scaffolds, and unit tests, and providing on-demand snippets from web pages. It’s especially useful for individual developers and small teams wanting quick multi-line completions and cross-file awareness without heavy cost.
How do I get started with Codeium?+
Install the official extension in your editor and sign in. For VS Code, install from the Extensions pane, sign in with GitHub or email via the Codeium panel, then place the cursor and trigger 'Complete' or press Tab to accept suggestions. Verify private completion access if you’re on Pro or a Team plan.

More Code Assistants Tools

Browse all Code Assistants tools →
💻
GitHub Copilot
Code Assistants AI that speeds coding, testing, and reviews
Updated Mar 26, 2026
💻
Tabnine
Context-aware code completions for teams and individual developers
Updated Apr 21, 2026
💻
Amazon CodeWhisperer
In-IDE code assistants for faster, AWS-aware development
Updated Apr 22, 2026