4 Warning Signs of a Wrong .NET Development Partnership

Technological partnerships are hard to form and hardest to sustain, for a reason.

Entrusting a .NET development company with your infrastructure, sensitive business data, and technological vision is hard.

And, once you do, it is even harder to nurture the alignment of the in-house and augmented team, adapt to changing development requirements, and keep the cost overruns in check.

The IT outsourcing market will grow by USD 98 bn during 2020-2024 ~ According to Technavio.

But, as a technology leader you must do it. And not just do it but thrive as you do it.

Thinking about - “How can you build reliable and sustainable technological partnerships?”

Simple – by learning from other’s experiences and adopting practices that are sustainable.

Today, you will read noting about -

“How do you find an ideal .NET technology partner?”

“How do you vet for the expertise of a technology partner?”

“What are the advantages & benefits of working with a technology partner?”

You will get to explore -

“Signs of toxicity in a technological partnership”

“Viable solutions to overcome the toxicity”

Let the exploration begin!

Ineffective Collaboration Strategy

The frustration and chaos of collaboration falling flat is unhygienic for a technological partnership.

It may become a root cause of -

- Declining team morale

- Missing out on those deadlines

- Loss of direction for the development

- Siloed teams with dispersed beliefs about the end goal

It’s not the end unless you decide to disregard the partnership.

If you are fortunate enough to figure out that communication and collaboration alone are drivers of the bottleneck, you can choose to fix it.

Thinking about - “What could be a feasible solution?”

Simple – a well-articulated collaboration strategy to strike a balance between the in-house and augmented teams.

Here is how you can set up an effective collaboration strategy -

- Layout a unified project roadmap with timely milestones

- Establish clear and transparent channels of communication

- Foster a culture of collaboration with tools that help boost productivity

Embracing effective communication helps to weed off the woes of inefficiency.

Breach of Confidentiality

Nothing races past the loss of trust in a technological partnership.

It’s disheartening when your technology partner takes the leverage of access to your sensitive data for granted!

The cost that you bear is more than just dollars!

- It’s a stain on your integrity & security protocols, hard enough to erase

- It leaves your sensitive business data exposed to cyberattacks

- It shakes up your customers’ trust in you

There is only a dead-end if you get into such situations.

And the best you could do is be proactive in setting up fortified defense as you get into a technological partnership.

Thinking about - “How could confidentiality protocols be benchmarked?”

An easy way out - vet your security policies for finer details and establish clear adherence guidelines with airtight confidentiality agreements for the technology partners.

Turning your vulnerabilities into defense ensures that your tech partner is a guardian and not a threat.

Fluctuating Project Deliverables

Time-to-market is the one promise that a technology partner must keep.

Fluctuating project deliverables is the first step towards deflecting from that promise.

Consistently wavering deadlines.

Blurring project priorities with derailing team morale.

Scramble to realign the project development strategies.

These are signs that you are on your way to missing out on the expected time-to-market!

Thinking about - "How can fluctuating deliverables be controlled?"

Simple, by leveraging strategic project management.

- You must set up realistic goals with clear timelines

- You must ensure planning follows adept execution

- You must devise proactive communication channels

Meticulous control over the project development pace ensures your technology partner keeps their promise.

Inflexible & Rigid Working Models

Adopting a rigid working model is a surefire way to ruin a technological partnership!

The choice of a working model is a crucial decision, and your technology partner has a role to help with due experience on-field.

If your technology partner fails to show the right path, you may -

- Experience cost overruns in the runtime

- Experience stagnation with missed opportunities

- Experience a lack of drive within the team without the freedom to excel

You sure do not want to end up like that, do you?

Thinking about - “How to build a sustainable technological partnership?”

Simply, agree on a flexible working model that caters to your dynamic project needs.

In other words -

- You must be able to save on operational costs

- You must be able to adapt to changing project scope

- You must be able to scale team size up & down, as needed

A technology partnership should provide the agility to adapt and transform. And, must not restrict you to deem fit into a mold.

A Quick Recap

Looking back at what we discussed today -

- Ineffective Collaboration Strategy

- Breach of Confidentiality

- Fluctuating Project Deliverables

- Inflexible & Rigid Working Models

These signs, if observed, then it’s time you should act immediately to change the course of actions or change the technology partner.

We are confident that you are now enabled with a wider perspective on how you can build sustainable technological partnerships.

Still, if you have any difficulties working with .NET development companies or thinking about swapping your technology partner, do let us know. We would be more than happy to help you.